Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain substantial questions of law, it should not have precluded the substantial questions of law concerning the extended period of limitation and penalty at the admission stage. The Supreme Court held that not allowing these questions to be raised could prejudice the appellant's case during the final adjudication. - Matter restored back before HC for to consider the matter afresh.
Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain substantial questions of law, it should not have precluded the substantial questions of law concerning the extended period of limitation and penalty at the admission stage. The Supreme Court held that not allowing these questions to be raised could prejudice the appellant's case during the final adjudication. - Matter restored back before HC for to consider the matter afresh.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
