Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain substantial questions of law, it should not have precluded the substantial questions of law concerning the extended period of limitation and penalty at the admission stage. The Supreme Court held that not allowing these questions to be raised could prejudice the appellant's case during the final adjudication. - Matter restored back before HC for to consider the matter afresh.
Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain substantial questions of law, it should not have precluded the substantial questions of law concerning the extended period of limitation and penalty at the admission stage. The Supreme Court held that not allowing these questions to be raised could prejudice the appellant's case during the final adjudication. - Matter restored back before HC for to consider the matter afresh.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
