Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain substantial questions of law, it should not have precluded the substantial questions of law concerning the extended period of limitation and penalty at the admission stage. The Supreme Court held that not allowing these questions to be raised could prejudice the appellant's case during the final adjudication. - Matter restored back before HC for to consider the matter afresh.
Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain substantial questions of law, it should not have precluded the substantial questions of law concerning the extended period of limitation and penalty at the admission stage. The Supreme Court held that not allowing these questions to be raised could prejudice the appellant's case during the final adjudication. - Matter restored back before HC for to consider the matter afresh.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
