Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The petitioner challenged a communication demanding a sum under the Sabka Viswas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, related to arrears on renting immovable property services - The High court found the demand unjustified, as the case was treated under "arrears of tax" instead of "litigation." - The categorization of the petitioner’s case from "Litigation" to "Arrears" in the SVLDRS-3 form was deemed incorrect.
The petitioner challenged a communication demanding a sum under the Sabka Viswas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, related to arrears on renting immovable property services - The High court found the demand unjustified, as the case was treated under "arrears of tax" instead of "litigation." - The categorization of the petitioner’s case from "Litigation" to "Arrears" in the SVLDRS-3 form was deemed incorrect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
