Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The petitioner challenged a communication demanding a sum under the Sabka Viswas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, related to arrears on renting immovable property services - The High court found the demand unjustified, as the case was treated under "arrears of tax" instead of "litigation." - The categorization of the petitioner’s case from "Litigation" to "Arrears" in the SVLDRS-3 form was deemed incorrect.
The petitioner challenged a communication demanding a sum under the Sabka Viswas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, related to arrears on renting immovable property services - The High court found the demand unjustified, as the case was treated under "arrears of tax" instead of "litigation." - The categorization of the petitioner’s case from "Litigation" to "Arrears" in the SVLDRS-3 form was deemed incorrect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
