Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Approval u/s 80G(5) - eligibility - The tribunal had considered whether the law required significant charitable activities to be carried out to be eligible for registration under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act.- It was found that while the law had conditions for eligibility, it did not explicitly mandate a specific volume of charitable activities to be carried out within a certain timeframe. - The High Court also dismissed the appeal, affirming the tribunal's decision - Now, the Supreme Court has chosen not to intervene or overturn the judgment passed by the High Court while keeping the "question of law open.".
Approval u/s 80G(5) - eligibility - The tribunal had considered whether the law required significant charitable activities to be carried out to be eligible for registration under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act.- It was found that while the law had conditions for eligibility, it did not explicitly mandate a specific volume of charitable activities to be carried out within a certain timeframe. - The High Court also dismissed the appeal, affirming the tribunal's decision - Now, the Supreme Court has chosen not to intervene or overturn the judgment passed by the High Court while keeping the "question of law open.".
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.