Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Approval u/s 80G(5) - eligibility - The tribunal had considered whether the law required significant charitable activities to be carried out to be eligible for registration under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act.- It was found that while the law had conditions for eligibility, it did not explicitly mandate a specific volume of charitable activities to be carried out within a certain timeframe. - The High Court also dismissed the appeal, affirming the tribunal's decision - Now, the Supreme Court has chosen not to intervene or overturn the judgment passed by the High Court while keeping the "question of law open.".
Approval u/s 80G(5) - eligibility - The tribunal had considered whether the law required significant charitable activities to be carried out to be eligible for registration under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act.- It was found that while the law had conditions for eligibility, it did not explicitly mandate a specific volume of charitable activities to be carried out within a certain timeframe. - The High Court also dismissed the appeal, affirming the tribunal's decision - Now, the Supreme Court has chosen not to intervene or overturn the judgment passed by the High Court while keeping the "question of law open.".
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.