Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Notice issued on the basis of statement recorded during survey u/s 133A - The High court observed that the survey conducted led to several factual findings essential for initiating the proceedings u/s 148A. It was noted that the statement of one of the partners, was not the sole basis for the proceedings and that other evidence arising from the survey was also considered. The court also acknowledged that a statement was recorded under Section 131, which has the same powers as a civil court, including examining individuals under oath. - Consequently, High Court refused to interfere.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Notice issued on the basis of statement recorded during survey u/s 133A - The High court observed that the survey conducted led to several factual findings essential for initiating the proceedings u/s 148A. It was noted that the statement of one of the partners, was not the sole basis for the proceedings and that other evidence arising from the survey was also considered. The court also acknowledged that a statement was recorded under Section 131, which has the same powers as a civil court, including examining individuals under oath. - Consequently, High Court refused to interfere.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.