Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Reopening of assessment - prior period of expenses - mercantile system of accounting - The petitioner argued that the reliance on the assessment order for AY 2010-2011 was unjustified since the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] later allowed the prior period expenses for that year, and the Revenue accepted the CIT(A)'s order. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) also upheld this position in a similar case. - The High court agreed with the petitioner and quashed the reassessment proceedings.
Reopening of assessment - prior period of expenses - mercantile system of accounting - The petitioner argued that the reliance on the assessment order for AY 2010-2011 was unjustified since the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] later allowed the prior period expenses for that year, and the Revenue accepted the CIT(A)'s order. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) also upheld this position in a similar case. - The High court agreed with the petitioner and quashed the reassessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
