Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Reopening of assessment - prior period of expenses - mercantile system of accounting - The petitioner argued that the reliance on the assessment order for AY 2010-2011 was unjustified since the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] later allowed the prior period expenses for that year, and the Revenue accepted the CIT(A)'s order. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) also upheld this position in a similar case. - The High court agreed with the petitioner and quashed the reassessment proceedings.
Reopening of assessment - prior period of expenses - mercantile system of accounting - The petitioner argued that the reliance on the assessment order for AY 2010-2011 was unjustified since the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] later allowed the prior period expenses for that year, and the Revenue accepted the CIT(A)'s order. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) also upheld this position in a similar case. - The High court agreed with the petitioner and quashed the reassessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
