Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Maintainability of appeal in writ Court - Validity of re-assessment order passed u/s 147 - The High court, after hearing both parties and reviewing the submissions and relevant case law, concluded that the appellant did not challenge the initial stages of the re-assessment process and, therefore, could not question the correctness of the order passed under Section 148A(d) at this stage. The court also noted that the appellant participated in the re-assessment proceedings and had the opportunity to present their case. - The court dismissed the appeal.
Maintainability of appeal in writ Court - Validity of re-assessment order passed u/s 147 - The High court, after hearing both parties and reviewing the submissions and relevant case law, concluded that the appellant did not challenge the initial stages of the re-assessment process and, therefore, could not question the correctness of the order passed under Section 148A(d) at this stage. The court also noted that the appellant participated in the re-assessment proceedings and had the opportunity to present their case. - The court dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
