Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Cancellation of GST registration of the Petitioner with retrospective effect - The High court noted that the Show Cause Notice and the order of cancellation did not specify cogent reasons for the retrospective cancellation of registration. The court observed that under Section 29(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the proper officer may cancel GST registration from a retrospective date if deemed fit, but such satisfaction must be based on objective criteria and cannot be subjective.
Cancellation of GST registration of the Petitioner with retrospective effect - The High court noted that the Show Cause Notice and the order of cancellation did not specify cogent reasons for the retrospective cancellation of registration. The court observed that under Section 29(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the proper officer may cancel GST registration from a retrospective date if deemed fit, but such satisfaction must be based on objective criteria and cannot be subjective.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.