Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Demand u/s 74 - violation of principles of natural justice - The High court noted that Section 75(4) of the CGST Act mandates that an opportunity for hearing must be granted either when a specific request is received in writing from a person chargeable with tax or when any adverse decision is contemplated against such a person. The court found that even if the petitioners did not specifically request a personal hearing, they were entitled to one since an adverse decision was contemplated against them.
Demand u/s 74 - violation of principles of natural justice - The High court noted that Section 75(4) of the CGST Act mandates that an opportunity for hearing must be granted either when a specific request is received in writing from a person chargeable with tax or when any adverse decision is contemplated against such a person. The court found that even if the petitioners did not specifically request a personal hearing, they were entitled to one since an adverse decision was contemplated against them.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.