Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Validity of final assessment order u/s 144B - petitioner request for adjournment was ignored - The High court remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer to decide afresh from the stage of the draft assessment order - This decision is made in light of a precedent that emphasizes the right of an assessee to respond to a draft assessment order and the expectation of a lenient approach by the Income Tax Department, particularly during the challenging times of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Validity of final assessment order u/s 144B - petitioner request for adjournment was ignored - The High court remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer to decide afresh from the stage of the draft assessment order - This decision is made in light of a precedent that emphasizes the right of an assessee to respond to a draft assessment order and the expectation of a lenient approach by the Income Tax Department, particularly during the challenging times of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.