Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of order u/s 148A(d) without granting time to the petitioner to file reply to the notice u/s 148A(b) - The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assessing Officer to provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as required under Section 148A(b) of the Act. - The High court emphasized the need for the assessee to be given a chance to respond to the show-cause notice, ensuring compliance with procedural fairness in the reassessment proceedings.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of order u/s 148A(d) without granting time to the petitioner to file reply to the notice u/s 148A(b) - The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assessing Officer to provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as required under Section 148A(b) of the Act. - The High court emphasized the need for the assessee to be given a chance to respond to the show-cause notice, ensuring compliance with procedural fairness in the reassessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.