Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Validity of converting the “limited scrutiny” into “complete scrutiny” - The tribunal found substance in the claim of the AR that the A.O had clearly exceeded his jurisdiction by making disallowances/additions which never formed the basis for selection of the case of the assessee company for “limited scrutiny”. - Following the order the of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Raipur in the case of Aryadeep Complex (P) Ltd., the assessment order u/s 143(3) quashed.
Validity of converting the “limited scrutiny” into “complete scrutiny” - The tribunal found substance in the claim of the AR that the A.O had clearly exceeded his jurisdiction by making disallowances/additions which never formed the basis for selection of the case of the assessee company for “limited scrutiny”. - Following the order the of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Raipur in the case of Aryadeep Complex (P) Ltd., the assessment order u/s 143(3) quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.