Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Validity of converting the “limited scrutiny” into “complete scrutiny” - The tribunal found substance in the claim of the AR that the A.O had clearly exceeded his jurisdiction by making disallowances/additions which never formed the basis for selection of the case of the assessee company for “limited scrutiny”. - Following the order the of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Raipur in the case of Aryadeep Complex (P) Ltd., the assessment order u/s 143(3) quashed.
Validity of converting the “limited scrutiny” into “complete scrutiny” - The tribunal found substance in the claim of the AR that the A.O had clearly exceeded his jurisdiction by making disallowances/additions which never formed the basis for selection of the case of the assessee company for “limited scrutiny”. - Following the order the of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Raipur in the case of Aryadeep Complex (P) Ltd., the assessment order u/s 143(3) quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
