Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95749 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained jewellery - The Tribunal found that the addition made by the AO was not justified, especially in light of the appellant's consistent income and status. - While assessing unexplained jewelry, the AO must consider the assessee's income, status, and cultural norms, and that mere possession of jewelry beyond a certain limit doesn't necessarily imply undisclosed income. - AT
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained jewellery - The Tribunal found that the addition made by the AO was not justified, especially in light of the appellant's consistent income and status. - While assessing unexplained jewelry, the AO must consider the assessee's income, status, and cultural norms, and that mere possession of jewelry beyond a certain limit doesn't necessarily imply undisclosed income. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.