Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 30, 2024Case LawsAT
CIRP - Rejection of Application seeking intervention - Locus to file application - infringement of rights - Approval of resolution plan (offer) of another party - The tribunal decided that the appellant, having been a participant in the CIRP process and having submitted offers, does indeed have the locus to file the intervention application. It observed that the NCLT's order examining the appellant’s contentions on merits while also stating they lacked locus was contradictory. - However, the tribunal permits the appellant to file an application with their objections/affidavits before the NCLT - AT
CIRP - Rejection of Application seeking intervention - Locus to file application - infringement of rights - Approval of resolution plan (offer) of another party - The tribunal decided that the appellant, having been a participant in the CIRP process and having submitted offers, does indeed have the locus to file the intervention application. It observed that the NCLT's order examining the appellant’s contentions on merits while also stating they lacked locus was contradictory. - However, the tribunal permits the appellant to file an application with their objections/affidavits before the NCLT - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
