Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Tribunal dismissed the Revenue-Department's appeal against the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai's decision. - The basis for the demand, which was the variance between Service Tax-3 Returns and Income Tax Returns, was deemed flawed due to inconsistencies, including mismatched financial year comparisons and incorrect service tax rate applications. - AT
Tribunal dismissed the Revenue-Department's appeal against the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai's decision. - The basis for the demand, which was the variance between Service Tax-3 Returns and Income Tax Returns, was deemed flawed due to inconsistencies, including mismatched financial year comparisons and incorrect service tax rate applications. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.