Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Maintainability of Revision application before GVAT Tribunal - the Deputy Commissioner, in cancelling the petitioner's registration with retrospective effect, had acted under delegated powers from the Commissioner as per Section 75(1)(a) of the VAT Act. Therefore, an appeal under Section 73 was not applicable, but a revision before the Tribunal under Section 75(1)(b) was. - HC
Maintainability of Revision application before GVAT Tribunal - the Deputy Commissioner, in cancelling the petitioner's registration with retrospective effect, had acted under delegated powers from the Commissioner as per Section 75(1)(a) of the VAT Act. Therefore, an appeal under Section 73 was not applicable, but a revision before the Tribunal under Section 75(1)(b) was. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.