Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Maintainability of Revision application before GVAT Tribunal - the Deputy Commissioner, in cancelling the petitioner's registration with retrospective effect, had acted under delegated powers from the Commissioner as per Section 75(1)(a) of the VAT Act. Therefore, an appeal under Section 73 was not applicable, but a revision before the Tribunal under Section 75(1)(b) was. - HC
Maintainability of Revision application before GVAT Tribunal - the Deputy Commissioner, in cancelling the petitioner's registration with retrospective effect, had acted under delegated powers from the Commissioner as per Section 75(1)(a) of the VAT Act. Therefore, an appeal under Section 73 was not applicable, but a revision before the Tribunal under Section 75(1)(b) was. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.