Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Duty Drawback - Levy of penalties or abetment - The appellant, implicated in a fraudulent drawback scheme, was found to have abetted by creating a fake identity for the real exporter and assisting in financial transactions. While incriminating evidence was found at appellant's residence, the penalties imposed on him were considered disproportionate. Consequently, the penalty was reduced from Three Lakh to Fifty Thousand Rupees, but no further interference with the order was made. - AT
Duty Drawback - Levy of penalties or abetment - The appellant, implicated in a fraudulent drawback scheme, was found to have abetted by creating a fake identity for the real exporter and assisting in financial transactions. While incriminating evidence was found at appellant's residence, the penalties imposed on him were considered disproportionate. Consequently, the penalty was reduced from Three Lakh to Fifty Thousand Rupees, but no further interference with the order was made. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
