Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Validity of assessment order - imposition of tax, interest and penalty - difference in turnover as between Form GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B - The court found the petitioner's explanations unconvincing but acknowledged the lack of opportunity for a small business to respond. Consequently, the order was quashed, and the matter remanded for re-consideration, limiting the petitioner's response to proceedings before the assessing officer. The court directed the re-assessment to be completed within two months. - HC
Validity of assessment order - imposition of tax, interest and penalty - difference in turnover as between Form GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B - The court found the petitioner's explanations unconvincing but acknowledged the lack of opportunity for a small business to respond. Consequently, the order was quashed, and the matter remanded for re-consideration, limiting the petitioner's response to proceedings before the assessing officer. The court directed the re-assessment to be completed within two months. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.