Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Validity of assessment order - imposition of tax, interest and penalty - difference in turnover as between Form GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B - The court found the petitioner's explanations unconvincing but acknowledged the lack of opportunity for a small business to respond. Consequently, the order was quashed, and the matter remanded for re-consideration, limiting the petitioner's response to proceedings before the assessing officer. The court directed the re-assessment to be completed within two months. - HC
Validity of assessment order - imposition of tax, interest and penalty - difference in turnover as between Form GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B - The court found the petitioner's explanations unconvincing but acknowledged the lack of opportunity for a small business to respond. Consequently, the order was quashed, and the matter remanded for re-consideration, limiting the petitioner's response to proceedings before the assessing officer. The court directed the re-assessment to be completed within two months. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.