Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Levy of Penalty order u/s 129(3) - Neither in the SCN nor in the order u/s 129(3) there was any allegation that non downloading of E-way Bill-02 was done with intention to evade tax - The court noted that there was no allegation of intentional tax evasion in the case of the petitioner, whose goods were detained after completion of the journey. The imposition of the maximum penalty was found unjustifiable, and the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the writ petition and granting consequential reliefs. - HC
Levy of Penalty order u/s 129(3) - Neither in the SCN nor in the order u/s 129(3) there was any allegation that non downloading of E-way Bill-02 was done with intention to evade tax - The court noted that there was no allegation of intentional tax evasion in the case of the petitioner, whose goods were detained after completion of the journey. The imposition of the maximum penalty was found unjustifiable, and the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the writ petition and granting consequential reliefs. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
