Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
The audit wing of the State GST Authority directed to keep in abeyance all proceedings related to discrepancy note no. 3, including the show cause notice dated 29.12.2023. This decision was made because the same discrepancy is already under adjudication by the CGST Authority, following a show cause notice dated 28.03.2023. The court ordered that the State GST Authority's audit wing should not proceed with their actions until the adjudication order by the CGST Authority is passed. - HC
The audit wing of the State GST Authority directed to keep in abeyance all proceedings related to discrepancy note no. 3, including the show cause notice dated 29.12.2023. This decision was made because the same discrepancy is already under adjudication by the CGST Authority, following a show cause notice dated 28.03.2023. The court ordered that the State GST Authority's audit wing should not proceed with their actions until the adjudication order by the CGST Authority is passed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.