Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal emphasized the principle that for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, the onus is on the revenue to show that there was a failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. The Tribunal held that mere change of opinion or re-examination of facts already on record without new tangible material cannot justify reassessment proceedings, especially when initiated after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. - AT
Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal emphasized the principle that for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, the onus is on the revenue to show that there was a failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. The Tribunal held that mere change of opinion or re-examination of facts already on record without new tangible material cannot justify reassessment proceedings, especially when initiated after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
