Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Transfer of pending application for winding up of the respondent company to the NCLT under IBC - The decision reflects the principle that winding up petitions pending before High Courts, which have not progressed to an advanced stage, should be transferred to the NCLT, in line with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the Companies Act, 2013. The Supreme Court's judgment in Action Ispat and Power Limited v. Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited was cited, emphasizing that winding up proceedings at a pre-admission stage or those where no irreversible actions (like the sale of assets) have occurred are compulsorily transferable to the NCLT. - HC
Transfer of pending application for winding up of the respondent company to the NCLT under IBC - The decision reflects the principle that winding up petitions pending before High Courts, which have not progressed to an advanced stage, should be transferred to the NCLT, in line with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the Companies Act, 2013. The Supreme Court's judgment in Action Ispat and Power Limited v. Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited was cited, emphasizing that winding up proceedings at a pre-admission stage or those where no irreversible actions (like the sale of assets) have occurred are compulsorily transferable to the NCLT. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.