Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
SUBKA VISHWAS” [Legacy Dispute Resolution] Scheme Rules, 2019 - petitioner was unable to make payment due to technical glitch - The judgment reiterates the principle that a scheme must be followed strictly according to its terms and conditions. In this case, the "SUBKA VISHWAS" Scheme, being a complete code in itself, required adherence to specific time limits for filing and payment, which the petitioner failed to meet. The court emphasized that extending the time limit for compliance with the scheme’s provisions is beyond its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - HC
SUBKA VISHWAS” [Legacy Dispute Resolution] Scheme Rules, 2019 - petitioner was unable to make payment due to technical glitch - The judgment reiterates the principle that a scheme must be followed strictly according to its terms and conditions. In this case, the "SUBKA VISHWAS" Scheme, being a complete code in itself, required adherence to specific time limits for filing and payment, which the petitioner failed to meet. The court emphasized that extending the time limit for compliance with the scheme’s provisions is beyond its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.