Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Refund amount recovered coercively - Despite paying 20% of the tax in dispute, the tax authorities issued a demand and forcibly recovered the full balance - GST Appellate Tribunal is not constituted - The Court found the tax officer's actions in forcibly recovering the full amount to be high-handed and against the legislative mandate. - The Court directed the refund of the entire amount recovered with 12% interest per annum if not refunded within two weeks. It also imposed costs on the responsible officer. - HC
Refund amount recovered coercively - Despite paying 20% of the tax in dispute, the tax authorities issued a demand and forcibly recovered the full balance - GST Appellate Tribunal is not constituted - The Court found the tax officer's actions in forcibly recovering the full amount to be high-handed and against the legislative mandate. - The Court directed the refund of the entire amount recovered with 12% interest per annum if not refunded within two weeks. It also imposed costs on the responsible officer. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
