Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Refund amount recovered coercively - Despite paying 20% of the tax in dispute, the tax authorities issued a demand and forcibly recovered the full balance - GST Appellate Tribunal is not constituted - The Court found the tax officer's actions in forcibly recovering the full amount to be high-handed and against the legislative mandate. - The Court directed the refund of the entire amount recovered with 12% interest per annum if not refunded within two weeks. It also imposed costs on the responsible officer. - HC
Refund amount recovered coercively - Despite paying 20% of the tax in dispute, the tax authorities issued a demand and forcibly recovered the full balance - GST Appellate Tribunal is not constituted - The Court found the tax officer's actions in forcibly recovering the full amount to be high-handed and against the legislative mandate. - The Court directed the refund of the entire amount recovered with 12% interest per annum if not refunded within two weeks. It also imposed costs on the responsible officer. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
