Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Penalty u/s. 271AAB - The assessees’ sole substantive grievance appears to be that the AO’s corresponding show cause notices dated 29.12.2017 (supra) had not been validly issued. We find no merit in the assessees’ stand once it has come on record that the impugned penalty has been levied @ 10% since falling in the first and foremost limb u/sec. 271AAB(1)(a)(i) to (iii) of the Act in the specified circumstances. - AT
Penalty u/s. 271AAB - The assessees’ sole substantive grievance appears to be that the AO’s corresponding show cause notices dated 29.12.2017 (supra) had not been validly issued. We find no merit in the assessees’ stand once it has come on record that the impugned penalty has been levied @ 10% since falling in the first and foremost limb u/sec. 271AAB(1)(a)(i) to (iii) of the Act in the specified circumstances. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
