Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - The appellant has contravened the provisions of Section 17 and 46(4) of the Act by intentionally filing wrong declarations and by their acts of omissions and commissions had rendered the goods liable for confiscation under Section 111(l) and 111(m) of the Act. The appellant filing the Bill of Entry under self-assessment was duty bound to submit true and correct details. - No interference is called for in the quantum of redemption fine - AT
Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - The appellant has contravened the provisions of Section 17 and 46(4) of the Act by intentionally filing wrong declarations and by their acts of omissions and commissions had rendered the goods liable for confiscation under Section 111(l) and 111(m) of the Act. The appellant filing the Bill of Entry under self-assessment was duty bound to submit true and correct details. - No interference is called for in the quantum of redemption fine - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
