Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Business expenses - CSR - The expenditure could be related to ‘Commercial Expediency’, as any amount contributed to the BATF would generate goodwill of the local community as well as the Government Authorities. It must also be emphasised that the concept of ‘Commercial Expediency’ is from the perspective of an assessee and cannot be judged from the perspective of what the Revenue construes it to be ‘Commercial expediency.’ - As the subject matter of dispute relates to assessment year 2010-11, it can be stated that the said explanation to Section 37 of the I.T. Act would not apply as regards the present subject matter of dispute. - HC
Business expenses - CSR - The expenditure could be related to ‘Commercial Expediency’, as any amount contributed to the BATF would generate goodwill of the local community as well as the Government Authorities. It must also be emphasised that the concept of ‘Commercial Expediency’ is from the perspective of an assessee and cannot be judged from the perspective of what the Revenue construes it to be ‘Commercial expediency.’ - As the subject matter of dispute relates to assessment year 2010-11, it can be stated that the said explanation to Section 37 of the I.T. Act would not apply as regards the present subject matter of dispute. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
