Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 11, 2024Case LawsAT
initiation of CIRP - pre-existing dispute between the parties - The defence raised by the Corporate Debtor in their reply to the Section 8 demand notice and detailed reply filed in Section 9 application is not illusory or moonshine and that the nature of dispute raised was such that it required adjudication by competent court. - NCLT rightly rejected the application - AT
initiation of CIRP - pre-existing dispute between the parties - The defence raised by the Corporate Debtor in their reply to the Section 8 demand notice and detailed reply filed in Section 9 application is not illusory or moonshine and that the nature of dispute raised was such that it required adjudication by competent court. - NCLT rightly rejected the application - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.