Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Jurisdiction of the Income Tax authority to issue notice u/s 143[2] of the IT Act under the National Faceless Assessment Scheme (NaFAC / NFAC) - The provisions of Section 124 stipulate that when an assessee calls in question the jurisdiction of the AO - If the right to call in question the jurisdiction is left open to be raised at any stage, the proceedings will remain inconclusive and that could not have been the intendment of the legislature. Therefore, this Court must opine that the petitioner must fail - HC
Jurisdiction of the Income Tax authority to issue notice u/s 143[2] of the IT Act under the National Faceless Assessment Scheme (NaFAC / NFAC) - The provisions of Section 124 stipulate that when an assessee calls in question the jurisdiction of the AO - If the right to call in question the jurisdiction is left open to be raised at any stage, the proceedings will remain inconclusive and that could not have been the intendment of the legislature. Therefore, this Court must opine that the petitioner must fail - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.