Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reasons to believe - notice u/s 148A(b) - the case of the petitioner is covered by information specified in Explanation 1(i) of Section 148 of the IT Act. It is not the case of the petitioner that information disclosed vide notice under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act is not covered by the information specified in Explanation 1(i) of Section 148 of the IT Act. - We respectfully disagree with the judgment of Charu Chains and Jewels Pvt. Ltd. [2023 (1) TMI 486 - DELHI HIGH COURT] - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reasons to believe - notice u/s 148A(b) - the case of the petitioner is covered by information specified in Explanation 1(i) of Section 148 of the IT Act. It is not the case of the petitioner that information disclosed vide notice under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act is not covered by the information specified in Explanation 1(i) of Section 148 of the IT Act. - We respectfully disagree with the judgment of Charu Chains and Jewels Pvt. Ltd. [2023 (1) TMI 486 - DELHI HIGH COURT] - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.