Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 264 - penalty u/s 270A imposed - waiver of penalty u/s 270AA - The very fact that the indications were made that the matter fall within (a) and (c), necessarily means that even the revisional authority was not sure whether it was a case of misrepresentation or suppression of facts or claim of expense, not substantiated by any evidence. - Order passed by the assessing authority rejecting application u/s 270AA and the order passed by the revisional authority rejecting revision petition, cannot be sustained. - HC
Revision u/s 264 - penalty u/s 270A imposed - waiver of penalty u/s 270AA - The very fact that the indications were made that the matter fall within (a) and (c), necessarily means that even the revisional authority was not sure whether it was a case of misrepresentation or suppression of facts or claim of expense, not substantiated by any evidence. - Order passed by the assessing authority rejecting application u/s 270AA and the order passed by the revisional authority rejecting revision petition, cannot be sustained. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.