Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - assessee, who is the appellant, is a government contractor showed payments exceeding Rs. 20,000/- in cash on various dates for materials purchased - there are no vouchers produced to substantiate the claim of separate payments having been made on a single day at the work spots where the delivery of the goods supplied were made. - Additions confirmed - HC
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - assessee, who is the appellant, is a government contractor showed payments exceeding Rs. 20,000/- in cash on various dates for materials purchased - there are no vouchers produced to substantiate the claim of separate payments having been made on a single day at the work spots where the delivery of the goods supplied were made. - Additions confirmed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
