Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 6, 2024Case LawsAT
Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was listed for hearing on 12.05.2023 and he entered appearance through Counsel, who inspite of entering his attendance in chat box, is not shown to be present. The relevant fact to be noticed is that the Appellant was well aware of the date 12.05.2023. - The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in rejecting IA No.3216 of 2023. - AT
Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was listed for hearing on 12.05.2023 and he entered appearance through Counsel, who inspite of entering his attendance in chat box, is not shown to be present. The relevant fact to be noticed is that the Appellant was well aware of the date 12.05.2023. - The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in rejecting IA No.3216 of 2023. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
