Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 6, 2024Case LawsAT
Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was listed for hearing on 12.05.2023 and he entered appearance through Counsel, who inspite of entering his attendance in chat box, is not shown to be present. The relevant fact to be noticed is that the Appellant was well aware of the date 12.05.2023. - The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in rejecting IA No.3216 of 2023. - AT
Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was listed for hearing on 12.05.2023 and he entered appearance through Counsel, who inspite of entering his attendance in chat box, is not shown to be present. The relevant fact to be noticed is that the Appellant was well aware of the date 12.05.2023. - The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in rejecting IA No.3216 of 2023. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
