Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Refund of Excess duty paid - re-assessment of bill of entry - amendment in the quantity of DAP imported in the Bill of Entry - It can be seen that the clearance of goods can only be said to have happened on 21.06.2018 when the bills of entry was finally assessed. From that perspective the documents presented by the appellant namely the police report dated 15.06.2018 was indeed available prior to the clearance of the goods and was infact submitted prior to clearance of the goods i.e. on 19.06.2018. - the amendment to the bill of entry should have been allowed in terms of section 149. - AT
Refund of Excess duty paid - re-assessment of bill of entry - amendment in the quantity of DAP imported in the Bill of Entry - It can be seen that the clearance of goods can only be said to have happened on 21.06.2018 when the bills of entry was finally assessed. From that perspective the documents presented by the appellant namely the police report dated 15.06.2018 was indeed available prior to the clearance of the goods and was infact submitted prior to clearance of the goods i.e. on 19.06.2018. - the amendment to the bill of entry should have been allowed in terms of section 149. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
