Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5041 to 5060 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Offence u/s 276C(1) - CIT(A) while deleting the penalty held that, The Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal held in the appeal No.16/10060/2019-20, the petitioner was under bonafide belief that there was no tax liability to be discharged by him on account of his residential status as NRE accounts and the TDS made by the bank. - once the penalty on the petitioner was deleted, the prosecution initiated by the respondent cannot be sustained. - HC
Offence u/s 276C(1) - CIT(A) while deleting the penalty held that, The Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal held in the appeal No.16/10060/2019-20, the petitioner was under bonafide belief that there was no tax liability to be discharged by him on account of his residential status as NRE accounts and the TDS made by the bank. - once the penalty on the petitioner was deleted, the prosecution initiated by the respondent cannot be sustained. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
