Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Offence u/s 276C(1) - CIT(A) while deleting the penalty held that, The Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal held in the appeal No.16/10060/2019-20, the petitioner was under bonafide belief that there was no tax liability to be discharged by him on account of his residential status as NRE accounts and the TDS made by the bank. - once the penalty on the petitioner was deleted, the prosecution initiated by the respondent cannot be sustained. - HC
Offence u/s 276C(1) - CIT(A) while deleting the penalty held that, The Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal held in the appeal No.16/10060/2019-20, the petitioner was under bonafide belief that there was no tax liability to be discharged by him on account of his residential status as NRE accounts and the TDS made by the bank. - once the penalty on the petitioner was deleted, the prosecution initiated by the respondent cannot be sustained. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
