Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - The payment of service tax was borne by the appellant themselves and the same was not collected from the service receiver. It is also fact on record that as per books of account for the year 2013-2014, the amount of refund shown as service tax receivable under asset side of trial balance sheet, this also proves that the amount of service tax has not been passed on to any other person - Refund allowed - AT
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - The payment of service tax was borne by the appellant themselves and the same was not collected from the service receiver. It is also fact on record that as per books of account for the year 2013-2014, the amount of refund shown as service tax receivable under asset side of trial balance sheet, this also proves that the amount of service tax has not been passed on to any other person - Refund allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
