Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 after 4 years - Validity of Sanction for issue of notice u/s 151 - respectfully following the aforesaid decision provisions of section 151, as it stood during the assessment year 2017-18, i.e. the year in which reasons were recorded by the AO for reopening the assessment and notice u/s 148 was issued, will be applicable and thus, we find no infirmity in the sanction granted by PCIT u/s 151 in the present case. - AT
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 after 4 years - Validity of Sanction for issue of notice u/s 151 - respectfully following the aforesaid decision provisions of section 151, as it stood during the assessment year 2017-18, i.e. the year in which reasons were recorded by the AO for reopening the assessment and notice u/s 148 was issued, will be applicable and thus, we find no infirmity in the sanction granted by PCIT u/s 151 in the present case. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.