Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4785
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95683 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271D - period of limitation - CIT(A) took the date on which the one year period from the end of the financial year in which the notice was issued as 31/03/2022. - We are unable to understand where from this date has come. Expiry of one year is not relatable to this date either from the date of the assessment order for the assessment year 2017-18 or from the date of issuance of notice u/s 271D of the Act, initiating the proceedings. - AT
Penalty u/s 271D - period of limitation - CIT(A) took the date on which the one year period from the end of the financial year in which the notice was issued as 31/03/2022. - We are unable to understand where from this date has come. Expiry of one year is not relatable to this date either from the date of the assessment order for the assessment year 2017-18 or from the date of issuance of notice u/s 271D of the Act, initiating the proceedings. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4785
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
