Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyDecember 27, 2023Case LawsAT
CIRP - The Kolkata Municipal Corporation who is owner of the premises by Development Agreement gave right of development of the premises to the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.1 has unauthorisedly without prior approval of the Appellant as alleged Assignment Agreement dated 06.03.2008 has given to the Corporate Debtor. - In event, the Respondent No.1 illegally transferred the possession to Respondent No.2 contrary to the Development Agreement for protection of such possession, Section 14(1)(d) cannot be relied on. - Termination of Development Agreement allowed - AT
CIRP - The Kolkata Municipal Corporation who is owner of the premises by Development Agreement gave right of development of the premises to the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.1 has unauthorisedly without prior approval of the Appellant as alleged Assignment Agreement dated 06.03.2008 has given to the Corporate Debtor. - In event, the Respondent No.1 illegally transferred the possession to Respondent No.2 contrary to the Development Agreement for protection of such possession, Section 14(1)(d) cannot be relied on. - Termination of Development Agreement allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
