Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Characterization of income - income arising from sub-licensing of shops and establishment along with the various services - ITAT, after referring to section 27 (iiib) of the Income Tax Act defining the term “deemed owner” and Section 269UA(f) of the Act defining the word “transfer”; held that the income derived by the assessee is “Income from House Property.” - the ITAT has committed a manifest error of law to ignore the object and business activity of the appellant assessee company, and misunderstood the nature of transaction of sub-license. - HC
Characterization of income - income arising from sub-licensing of shops and establishment along with the various services - ITAT, after referring to section 27 (iiib) of the Income Tax Act defining the term “deemed owner” and Section 269UA(f) of the Act defining the word “transfer”; held that the income derived by the assessee is “Income from House Property.” - the ITAT has committed a manifest error of law to ignore the object and business activity of the appellant assessee company, and misunderstood the nature of transaction of sub-license. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.